So, to a deafening chorus of retrospective “told you so”s, Jose Mourinho leaves Chelsea. It was on the cards; he’s been prowling the touchlines throwing hilariously cliched latino temper tantrum shapes for weeks now, in much the same way as Thierry Henry spent large parts of last season pouting smoulderingly, hands-on-hips, like the heroine of a poncy French film, before flouncing off to Barcelona.
The self-styled “special one” will be sorely missed, the meeeja tell us. But why, exactly? OK, he provided easy copy for lazy hacks, but to my mind, he was little more than a bully (ask any ref), a braggart and a whining underachiever. No side - not even dodgily-state-sponsored Real Madrid - have ever been able to spunk such ludicrous amounts of money on their squad; yet he was consistently unable to win the Champions League with Chelsea. OK, he won the Premiership twice - but he did so only by repeatedly replicating his Porto trick of getting a goal and then sticking 10 men behind the ball. Chelsea under Mourinho were boring as hell, like Arsenal under George Graham or the archetype of Italian catenaccio (the only difference being Mourinho’s sides strangle play slightly further up the field). Oh, and it takes a rare lack of man-management ability to make players like Ballack, Shevchenko and Wright-Phillips into nervous shadows of their former selves.
Some would argue that he was “charming”, or “a character” - to them I’d say leave off football punditry and buy a copy of “Knitting Weekly”, as you’re probably a sexually frustrated housewife. Fans of actual football will simply shrug and forget Mourinho, saving their admiration for proper managers like Alex Ferguson, Arsene Wenger and Carlo Ancelotti.
(Apologies to anyone who couldn’t give a monkeys about footie. I’ll stand you a copy of “Knitting Weekly” if you like.)For more on Jose Mourinho, I suggest you consult the great Paul Whitehouse…