Isn’t it remarkable how unlike themselves some people have looked recently? Firstly E-toe(nian)rag David Cameron…
… and then this shiny spherical orange blob, whoever / whatever he / she / it is…

(This advert has been mercilessly, endlessly, and very amusingly ripped to shreds here…)
Secondly, our glorious no-hair-apparent to the throne as he used to look:
… compared to whatever the hell this Berlusconi-esque-but-without-needing-to-wear-a-bandana-for-weeks madman’s folly-cular re-creation reckons itself to be -
Poor Billy-boy; up to the age of 18, he was the spit of his (undeniably beautiful) mother and pretty much the best-looking young man in the entire world. Then the recessive inbred Saxe-Coburg-und-Gotha, sorry, Windsor gene kicked in, and now he looks like his idiot uncle Edward, and ever more like his gurning donkey of a father.
Funny thing is, the slap-headed Windsor male gene seems mysteriously to have passed Prince Harry by* somehow… hmmm…. (author scratches head in faux curiosity - or rather makes to do so and then stops himself for fear that more of his own rapidly-thinning hair should fall out.)
(* - I guess there’s no way to predict who it will affect and Hewitt won’t.)
This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 17th, 2010 at 11:59 am and is filed under Fatuous comments and ridiculous generalisations, Lookey-likeys. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.





HAW HAW HAW! Sometimes, Taf, I wonder what comes first - the post or the puns.
Some of those Cameron posters a pure roflarity. There are some more good ones here as well as some Labour based ones here … including:
ROFLOL!
:D
Thanks, TM - the puns just come to me in a flash of perspiration. I’m trying to save them all up and use them in posts so as not to subject the readership to too many self-penned “jokes”.
Re. the piss-taking of political ads and all that jiggery-pokery (if I can entreat everyone to stop rolling on the floor for just a minute) - do you think that these sites are organic spoofery by jocular members of the public, or do you think that both main political parties covertly spend the equivalent of the national debt of Greece on genetically engineering vast armies of tech nerds, housing them in giant silos two miles under the earth’s crust, subjecting them to 24-hour-a-day political propaganda and old episodes of “Have I Got News for You”, and then hooking their brain-fluids directly up to the internet in the hopes that they’ll create something “viral” which will make the other side look vaguely silly?
They’ve got Susan (Suzanne?) Boyle singing at the Sanremo Festival. You should see the publicity shot in the Stampa. They’ve made her look like Cheryl Cole’s nan with an afro.
Thank heavens for the blog then - I can only imagine that otherwise you’d save years of them up for use on one day, thus precipitating the end of the world.
In relation to GM techno-nerds - were we in the US, where negative campaigning is open and common, I’d guess that many such initiatives were more planned than spontaneous. I suspect that this isn’t yet the case in the UK and that this sort one-sided political piss-taking is at least initially the work of jocular members of the public - I’d be suprised, if political parties didn’t perhaps contribute to this kind of thing a bit once in motion though … and I imagine the BBC themselves put together the one above - which would literally be the funniest thing in the world since this was posted on VeryDemotivational:
What do you reckon, Taf?